<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What would be the most important outcome if a given &#8221; Government&#8221; decided to adopt the &#8221; Lean &#8221; approach ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://qualityassurancemanagement.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-would-be-the-most-important-outcome-if-a-given-government-decided-to-adopt-the-lean-approach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://qualityassurancemanagement.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-would-be-the-most-important-outcome-if-a-given-government-decided-to-adopt-the-lean-approach/</link>
	<description>Sharing Synergies to Excellence   /   www.QualityAssuranceManagement.com</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Holts</title>
		<link>http://qualityassurancemanagement.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-would-be-the-most-important-outcome-if-a-given-government-decided-to-adopt-the-lean-approach/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Holts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qualityassurancemanagement.com/blog/?p=42#comment-128</guid>
		<description>You know, I have to tell you, I really enjoy this blog and the insight from everyone who participates. I find it to be refreshing and very informative. I wish there were more blogs like it. Anyway, I felt it was about time I posted it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I have to tell you, I really enjoy this blog and the insight from everyone who participates. I find it to be refreshing and very informative. I wish there were more blogs like it. Anyway, I felt it was about time I posted it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Harmon</title>
		<link>http://qualityassurancemanagement.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-would-be-the-most-important-outcome-if-a-given-government-decided-to-adopt-the-lean-approach/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qualityassurancemanagement.com/blog/?p=42#comment-120</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine just emailed me one of your articles from a while back.  I read that one a few more.  Really enjoy your blog.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine just emailed me one of your articles from a while back.  I read that one a few more.  Really enjoy your blog.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Holts</title>
		<link>http://qualityassurancemanagement.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-would-be-the-most-important-outcome-if-a-given-government-decided-to-adopt-the-lean-approach/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Holts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qualityassurancemanagement.com/blog/?p=42#comment-119</guid>
		<description>I found your site on Google and read a few of your other entires.  Nice Stuff.  I'm looking forward to reading more from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your site on Google and read a few of your other entires.  Nice Stuff.  I&#8217;m looking forward to reading more from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edison Reis</title>
		<link>http://qualityassurancemanagement.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-would-be-the-most-important-outcome-if-a-given-government-decided-to-adopt-the-lean-approach/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Edison Reis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qualityassurancemanagement.com/blog/?p=42#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much all colleagues for this huge feedback !

After carefully reading all comments and experiences it becomes clear that is possible and would be beneficial to pursue Lean Thinking within government agencies despite the difficulties that we may encounter.

All the best as always

Edison Reis
www.QualityAssuranceManagement.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much all colleagues for this huge feedback !</p>
<p>After carefully reading all comments and experiences it becomes clear that is possible and would be beneficial to pursue Lean Thinking within government agencies despite the difficulties that we may encounter.</p>
<p>All the best as always</p>
<p>Edison Reis<br />
<a href="http://www.QualityAssuranceManagement.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.QualityAssuranceManagement.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://qualityassurancemanagement.com/blog/2008/11/02/what-would-be-the-most-important-outcome-if-a-given-government-decided-to-adopt-the-lean-approach/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qualityassurancemanagement.com/blog/?p=42#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Hi Edison

The UK MOD have employed lean type processes to focus their efforts on the key activities for each unit.

To be fair, the whole process has been a thinly veiled attempt to reduce manpower and costs. In principle this should be a good thing to aim for.

However, I consider Armed Forces to be an insurance policy, called on when the Government requires certain tasks to be completed.

By 'leaning' the MOD, much of the excess capacity is being removed. Outsourcing means that non-value added tasks are being done by external agencies rather than service men and women. This is clearly cheaper, but with 3 impacts:

1. There are less UK billets that service people can fill. UK billets allow staff to work 'normal' hours and spend time with their families in the evening and weekends.
2. Outsourcing requires the contract to be written, agreed, funded and managed with an impact on contract management staff.
3. Outsourcing staff only do their contracted role. A service person can be used anywhere for any task and without the usual work-life constraints.

Reduction of military staff to a minimum makes it difficult to spare people for training, illness, recreation and personal development. It also signficantly reduces the possibility of surging or giving managers the level of contingency that may be required in the event of an unforeseen need.

Lean focuses people and processes on value streams considered. If the manpower and processes are tailored to those streams then there is a signficant impact on the flexiility to fulfil other additional value streams.

If Government adopt Lean then only those value streams assessed will be resourced and no contingency catered for. This I think is a signficant short fall.

Lean needs to be applied carefully in the Government context.

As I stated above, Armed Forces are an insurance policy. I think Lean is allowing us to pay fo a 3rd party only policy when we actually want fully comprehensive cover.

Hope this is a useful perspective.

Regards

Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Edison</p>
<p>The UK MOD have employed lean type processes to focus their efforts on the key activities for each unit.</p>
<p>To be fair, the whole process has been a thinly veiled attempt to reduce manpower and costs. In principle this should be a good thing to aim for.</p>
<p>However, I consider Armed Forces to be an insurance policy, called on when the Government requires certain tasks to be completed.</p>
<p>By &#8216;leaning&#8217; the MOD, much of the excess capacity is being removed. Outsourcing means that non-value added tasks are being done by external agencies rather than service men and women. This is clearly cheaper, but with 3 impacts:</p>
<p>1. There are less UK billets that service people can fill. UK billets allow staff to work &#8216;normal&#8217; hours and spend time with their families in the evening and weekends.<br />
2. Outsourcing requires the contract to be written, agreed, funded and managed with an impact on contract management staff.<br />
3. Outsourcing staff only do their contracted role. A service person can be used anywhere for any task and without the usual work-life constraints.</p>
<p>Reduction of military staff to a minimum makes it difficult to spare people for training, illness, recreation and personal development. It also signficantly reduces the possibility of surging or giving managers the level of contingency that may be required in the event of an unforeseen need.</p>
<p>Lean focuses people and processes on value streams considered. If the manpower and processes are tailored to those streams then there is a signficant impact on the flexiility to fulfil other additional value streams.</p>
<p>If Government adopt Lean then only those value streams assessed will be resourced and no contingency catered for. This I think is a signficant short fall.</p>
<p>Lean needs to be applied carefully in the Government context.</p>
<p>As I stated above, Armed Forces are an insurance policy. I think Lean is allowing us to pay fo a 3rd party only policy when we actually want fully comprehensive cover.</p>
<p>Hope this is a useful perspective.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
